H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lea Antonoplis vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 0-2
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 2–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1988 Phoenix third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1988* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-1 7-5 | Lea Antonoplis | Match data |
| Nov 29, 1985* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-1 6-1 | Lea Antonoplis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Antonoplis | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 |
| 28 | 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |