H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Patty Fendick H2H: 0-1

Patty Fendick holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1985 Manhattan Beach second round 2-6 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 25, 1985* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R64 Hard Patty Fendick #110 2-6 7-6 6-4 Lea Antonoplis #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,774 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,579 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,626 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,665 0 0 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,717 0 0 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,724 0 1 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,735 0 2 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,719 0 2 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,572 0 2 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,690 0 3
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,460 0 2 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,779 0 3
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,413 0 2 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,455 0 2 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,448 0 2 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,691 0 3
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,432 0 2 — — — — — — —