H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Patty Fendick H2H: 0-1

Patty Fendick holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1985 Manhattan Beach round of 64 2-6 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patty Fendick #110 2-6 7-6 6-4 Lea Antonoplis Match data Jul 25, 1985* R64 Manhattan Beach Series Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,550 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,739 0 3
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,724 0 3
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Patty Fendick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Patty Fendick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 1982 1500 107.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +81 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +0.97
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +31 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.32
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1986 1643 127.4 — — — — -7 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1987 1674 134.5 — — — — -15 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.36
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 1988 1798 142.2 — — — — +11 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.37
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1989 1763 138.6 — — — — +28 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.33
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1990 1740 136.0 — — — — +3 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -91 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -32 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 1993 1839 147.9 — — — — -9 — +30 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1994 1725 142.2 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 1995 1691 135.9 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1883 144.8 — — — — +11 -97 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.