H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lea Antonoplis vs Petra Huber H2H: 1-0
Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1985 Monticello third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1985* | Monticello | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lea Antonoplis | 6-4 6-1 | Petra Huber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Petra Huber | #458 | #37 | 13 | 1,737 | 58 | 79 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Antonoplis | Petra Huber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #53 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,626 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #84 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |