H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 0-1

Pilar Vasquez holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pilar Vasquez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pilar Vasquez won the 1990 Singapore Tennis Open round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Pilar Vasquez
PER Age 63 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pilar Vasquez #147 6-4 6-3 Lea Antonoplis #252 Match data Apr 25, 1990* R64 Singapore Tennis Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Pilar Vasquez — #66 8 1,800 94 130 42.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Pilar Vasquez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1980 15–0 100.0% — 1,695 0 3
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1981 22–11 66.7% — 1,709 0 4
19 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0 1982 11–14 44.0% — 1,623 0 4
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1 1983 11–14 44.0% — 1,612 0 4
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1984 7–17 29.2% #116 1,543 0 4
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2 1985 1–12 7.7% — 1,438 0 4
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2 1986 2–9 18.2% #149 1,408 0 4
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2 1987 8–11 42.1% #151 1,481 0 4
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2 1988 6–12 33.3% #161 1,510 0 4
26 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2 1989 4–9 30.8% #194 1,497 0 4
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2 1990 5–10 33.3% #151 1,473 0 4
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1991 1–10 9.1% #306 1,409 0 4
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2 1993 1–1 50.0% — 1,421 0 4
31 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Pilar Vasquez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 — — — — 15 0 15 100.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — —
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 0 7 7 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 34 59 93 36.6% 37 51 88 42.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Pilar Vasquez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1980 1696 133.9 — — — — — +95 — 100.0% +3.97 — 1–0 — +2.60
18 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95 1981 1709 135.3 — — — — -147 +85 — 64.9% +1.14 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.3 -0.51
19 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83 1982 1624 111.1 — — — — -52 +27 — 44.8% -0.50 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.80
20 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98 1983 1612 111.1 — — — — +14 +15 — 44.1% -0.47 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.9 +3.30
21 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54 1984 1544 104.5 — — — — +13 -1 — 35.2% -1.17 1–5 (17%) 4–1 (80%) 98.6 +0.59
22 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94 1985 1438 95.2 — — — — +89 +9 — 20.0% -2.73 0–4 (0%) — — +0.36
23 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13 1986 1408 95.0 — — — — +94 -5 — 25.0% -2.33 0–2 — — +0.30
24 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41 1987 1482 106.3 — — — — +84 -99 — 45.7% -0.30 3–5 (38%) 1–0 — +1.38
25 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44 1988 1510 111.3 — — — — +17 -100 — 39.5% -0.95 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.40
26 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18 1989 1498 108.0 — — — — -6 — — 33.3% -1.07 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.54
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87 1990 1474 96.8 — — — — +15 -57 — 36.4% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 +1.73
28 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66 1991 1409 98.9 — — — — +1 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.15
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77 1993 1422 97.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.13
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50 — 1800 115.2 — — — — +17 +23 — 44.4% -0.47 24–39 (38%) 18–16 (53%) 97.2 +5.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.