H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Sophie Amiach H2H: 0-2

Sophie Amiach holds a 2–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sophie Amiach leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sophie Amiach won the 1986 Boca Raton round of 128 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Sophie Amiach
FRA Age 62 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sophie Amiach #123 7-5 7-6 Lea Antonoplis #90 Match data Feb 11, 1986* R128 Boca Raton WTA 250 Hard
Sophie Amiach #75 6-3 6-1 Lea Antonoplis #115 Match data Jun 27, 1984* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sophie Amiach #577 #57 9 1,647 57 93 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Sophie Amiach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 1980 10–5 66.7% — 1,554 0 0
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1981 6–6 50.0% — 1,609 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1982 8–8 50.0% — 1,585 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1983 3–6 33.3% — 1,597 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1984 12–15 44.4% #76 1,627 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1985 5–15 25.0% #121 1,531 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1986 1–4 20.0% #173 1,514 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1988 0–1 0.0% #213 1,512 0 0
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1989 7–13 35.0% #129 1,555 0 0
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1990 2–6 25.0% #227 1,529 0 0
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1991 1–2 33.3% #243 1,517 0 0
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1992 0–2 0.0% #241 1,501 0 0
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1993 2–7 22.2% #199 1,477 0 0
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 1994 0–1 0.0% #233 1,471 0 0
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 1995 0–2 0.0% #446 1,459 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Sophie Amiach
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 13 26 39 33.3% 27 32 59 45.8% 16 22 38 42.1% 1 11 12 8.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Sophie Amiach
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 1980 1555 115.8 — — — — — +54 +8 73.1% +1.85 1–1 — — +2.63
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 1981 1610 112.9 — — — — — +92 — 46.4% -0.14 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.13
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1982 1585 105.8 — — — — — +68 — 50.0% -0.31 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +1.61
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1983 1598 109.9 — — — — — — +20 33.3% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.14
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1984 1627 116.0 — — — — -64 -4 +40 44.6% -0.48 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.9 +2.43
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1985 1532 102.5 — — — — -35 — +91 33.3% -1.58 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.1 +1.91
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1986 1515 102.1 — — — — -16 — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 2–0 — +0.03
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1988 1513 105.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.18
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1989 1555 119.2 — — — — -84 +17 +75 35.4% -1.08 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 104.3 -0.56
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1990 1530 102.1 — — — — — +28 +77 22.2% -2.67 2–0 1–1 — -0.10
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1991 1518 104.5 — — — — -43 — — 33.3% -0.50 — — — +0.39
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 1992 1501 105.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — -0.09
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1993 1477 104.3 — — — — -4 — — 30.0% -1.30 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.23
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 1994 1472 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.02
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 1995 1460 106.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 1–0 — -0.14
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1647 115.8 — — — — -47 +49 +50 40.4% -0.80 20–24 (45%) 16–12 (57%) 102.7 +5.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.