H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Terry Holladay H2H: 2-1

Lea Antonoplis holds a 2–1 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1980 Tucson round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Terry Holladay
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis 6-3 6-4 Terry Holladay Match data Dec 18, 1980* R32 Tucson WTA 250 Carpet
Terry Holladay 6-0 6-2 Lea Antonoplis Match data Oct 6, 1976* R64 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Lea Antonoplis 7-5 6-3 Terry Holladay Match data May 10, 1973* QF Los Angeles Socal Chps WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Terry Holladay #395 #39 7 1,942 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Terry Holladay
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 1972 2–3 40.0% — 1,473 0 0
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1973 4–2 66.7% — 1,507 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1974 12–17 41.4% — 1,563 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1975 32–23 58.2% — 1,758 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1976 28–20 58.3% — 1,880 0 1
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1977 15–15 50.0% — 1,935 0 1
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1978 2–8 20.0% — 1,860 0 1
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 1979 17–18 48.6% — 1,829 0 1
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1980 25–21 54.3% — 1,825 0 1
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1981 4–12 25.0% — 1,672 0 1
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,638 0 1
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1983 9–8 52.9% — 1,678 0 1
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1984 15–16 48.4% #50 1,676 0 1
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1985 9–16 36.0% — 1,608 0 1
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 1986 5–8 38.5% #103 1,627 0 1
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 1987 0–9 0.0% #315 1,511 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Terry Holladay
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 9 23 60.9%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1977 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1979 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 9 14 35.7%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 12 23 47.8%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 64 69 133 48.1% 23 27 50 46.0% 42 39 81 51.9% 50 64 114 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Terry Holladay
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 1970 1489 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 1972 1473 99.7 — — — — +72 — — 45.5% -0.27 0–1 0–1 — +1.13
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 1973 1507 105.7 — — — — +97 — — 66.7% +1.08 — 1–0 — +1.72
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1974 1564 120.1 — — — — -36 +43 — 44.6% -0.46 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 +1.00
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1975 1759 130.6 — — — — -20 -115 -113 57.1% +0.64 10–10 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 +3.05
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1976 1881 145.1 — — — — +18 -233 -149 59.2% +0.31 4–4 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 105.5 -2.82
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1977 1935 148.1 — — — — -11 — -129 51.5% +0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 -5.13
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1978 1860 129.1 — — — — -14 — -55 37.5% -0.92 1–5 (17%) 1–3 (25%) 94.1 -1.83
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 1979 1830 140.2 — — — — -3 — — 49.3% +0.03 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.65
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1980 1825 148.0 — — — — +8 — -5 52.0% +0.20 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -3.22
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1981 1672 108.6 — — — — +73 — +82 30.3% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.08
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1982 1638 94.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — 0.00
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1983 1679 131.8 — — — — +14 — +103 57.1% +0.28 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +1.24
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 1984 1677 119.7 — — — — +9 — +71 46.8% -0.44 9–6 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 100.8 +1.76
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1985 1608 118.7 — — — — +24 — +88 40.7% -0.75 4–5 (44%) 1–5 (17%) 98.1 +0.50
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 1986 1628 114.8 — — — — -6 — +92 40.7% -0.70 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 +0.25
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 1987 1511 88.0 — — — — +46 — +95 5.3% -3.53 0–1 0–1 — +0.19
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1943 138.0 — — — — +8 -60 -15 48.8% -0.14 51–55 (48%) 33–39 (46%) 98.9 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.