H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 1-0

Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1984 Birmingham round of 64 6-4 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tina Mochizuki
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis #127 6-4 3-6 7-5 Tina Mochizuki Match data Jun 13, 1984* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tina Mochizuki — — — 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Tina Mochizuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,449 0 0
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,424 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1971 2–3 40.0% — 1,445 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1972 3–5 37.5% — 1,432 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,463 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,452 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,438 0 0
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,552 0 0
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1981 13–7 65.0% — 1,612 0 1
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1982 6–3 66.7% — 1,629 0 1
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 1983 11–13 45.8% — 1,602 0 1
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 1984 5–17 22.7% — 1,454 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1985 5–12 29.4% — 1,475 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1986 11–19 36.7% — 1,521 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1987 8–25 24.2% — 1,455 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 1988 2–11 15.4% — 1,411 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Tina Mochizuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1969 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1970 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1971 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1973 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 36 62 98 36.7% 9 27 36 25.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 5 12 17 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Tina Mochizuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 1968 1484 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 1969 1450 94.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.55
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 1970 1425 82.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.75 — — — +0.38
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1971 1446 105.4 — — — — — +83 — 41.7% -1.67 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.16
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1972 1432 89.9 — — — — +20 +60 — 35.3% -1.53 1–0 1–0 — +1.65
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1973 1464 107.3 — — — — +59 — — 54.5% +0.55 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1974 1453 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1978 1438 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1980 1552 114.3 — — — — +26 — — 58.6% +0.64 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +2.50
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 1981 1612 122.2 — — — — — — — 61.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.50
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1982 1630 109.6 — — — — -12 — — 57.9% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +1.68
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 1983 1603 109.9 — — — — -3 -38 +4 45.0% -0.18 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +2.25
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 1984 1454 106.3 — — — — +20 +74 +143 34.6% -0.73 0–8 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 87.8 +1.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1476 106.7 — — — — +39 -8 +73 27.8% -1.78 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.99
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1522 112.2 — — — — +26 -72 +33 36.4% -1.26 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.4 +1.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1455 108.3 — — — — +35 -45 +65 27.4% -1.58 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.7 +0.36
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1412 109.7 — — — — -11 — +90 25.8% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.19
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1680 112.0 — — — — +21 +8 +60 40.2% -0.71 31–39 (44%) 20–25 (44%) 98.4 +6.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.