H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lea Antonoplis vs Vicki Nelson H2H: 2-2
Lea Antonoplis and Vicki Nelson are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1987 Indianapolis second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1987* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Lea Antonoplis | 6-4 6-2 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Feb 7, 1985* | Delray Beach | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lea Antonoplis | 7-6 6-7 6-4 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1983* | Ridgewood | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Vicki Nelson | 6-3 6-2 | Lea Antonoplis | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Vicki Nelson | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Lea Antonoplis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lea Antonoplis | Vicki Nelson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |