H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lea Antonoplis vs Wendy White H2H: 0-2

Wendy White holds a 2–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wendy White leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Wendy White won the 1986 Newport round of 32 7-6 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Wendy White
USA Age 65 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wendy White #63 7-6 3-6 6-4 Lea Antonoplis #100 Match data Jul 17, 1986* R32 Newport WTA 250 Grass
Wendy White #56 6-4 6-2 Lea Antonoplis #103 Match data Jun 11, 1986* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Wendy White #567 #28 24 1,856 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Antonoplis Wendy White
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0 1978 0–2 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
18 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,554 0 0
19 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0 1980 15–13 53.6% — 1,729 0 0
20 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1 1981 16–16 50.0% — 1,767 0 0
21 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2 1982 20–20 50.0% — 1,760 0 0
22 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2 1983 25–21 54.3% — 1,816 0 0
23 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2 1984 13–18 41.9% #67 1,717 0 0
24 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2 1985 8–16 33.3% #75 1,607 0 0
25 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2 1986 22–19 53.7% #45 1,701 0 1
26 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2 1987 17–17 50.0% #34 1,732 0 1
27 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2 1988 10–16 38.5% #66 1,671 0 1
28 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2 1989 9–16 36.0% #102 1,614 0 1
29 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2 1990 3–9 25.0% #154 1,566 0 1
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2 1992 0–1 0.0% #567 1,552 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Antonoplis Wendy White
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1980 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
22 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 9 7 16 56.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1985 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
26 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1% — 61 78 139 43.9% 17 26 43 39.5% 43 43 86 50.0% 40 42 82 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Antonoplis Wendy White
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98 1978 1491 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.08
18 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94 1979 1554 130.3 — — — — +71 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.40
19 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01 1980 1730 140.3 — — — — -12 — -101 53.1% +0.36 4–4 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.2 -1.19
20 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92 1981 1767 130.7 — — — — +7 -203 -117 49.3% +0.14 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 103.2 -1.36
21 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51 1982 1761 136.1 — — — — +8 — -121 47.1% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–6 (33%) 99.0 -1.25
22 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92 1983 1817 144.2 — — — — +14 -121 -154 50.0% -0.02 11–5 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 106.1 -3.83
23 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22 1984 1718 135.1 — — — — -9 -48 +26 44.3% -0.23 3–5 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 97.1 -1.52
24 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47 1985 1608 111.7 — — — — +8 — +122 34.5% -1.05 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 +1.08
25 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39 1986 1702 130.2 — — — — +2 -87 +29 52.0% +0.27 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 101.2 +1.66
26 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25 1987 1732 131.9 — — — — -64 -125 +101 46.6% -0.48 5–2 (71%) 5–0 (100%) 107.1 -1.31
27 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93 1988 1671 122.3 — — — — -30 — +140 37.9% -1.00 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 -0.54
28 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71 1989 1615 115.8 — — — — -3 -48 +119 39.3% -0.82 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 100.6 +0.21
29 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67 1990 1567 104.6 — — — — +6 — +169 25.0% -1.68 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 -0.13
30 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21 1992 1552 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
Career — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46 — 1856 137.2 — — — — -4 -116 +17 44.9% -0.33 59–44 (57%) 42–41 (51%) 107.1 -2.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.