H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Lea Ghirardi holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Ghirardi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lea Ghirardi won the 1995 China Open round of 32 0-6 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Ghirardi | 0-6 7-5 7-6 | Claudia Porwik | Match data | Sep 28, 1995* | R32 | China Open | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Ghirardi | #597 | #73 | 337 | 1,549 | 23 | 46 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,786 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Ghirardi | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #142 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #142 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lea Ghirardi | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1994 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1989 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1995 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 22 | 1996 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 23 | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 24 | 1998 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 25 | 1999 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 13 | 25 | 38 | 34.2% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | 73 | 83 | 156 | 46.8% | 13 | 21 | 34 | 38.2% | 11 | 20 | 31 | 35.5% | 17 | 22 | 39 | 43.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lea Ghirardi | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1577 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +33 | — | 50.0% | -0.42 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 105.3 | +0.65 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1582 | 120.5 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +32 | -42 | 44.7% | -0.46 | 4–8 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 97.8 | +1.43 |
| 19 | 1993 | 1479 | 114.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +45 | — | 38.5% | -0.08 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–2 | — | 0.00 | 1988 | 1572 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -30 | +14 | 41.4% | -0.72 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–2 (71%) | 103.4 | +0.38 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1466 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | +75 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.56 | 2–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.27 | 1989 | 1661 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -72 | — | 52.9% | +0.09 | 4–7 (36%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.4 | +0.85 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1484 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | +36 | +35 | — | 34.0% | -1.53 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–0 | — | +1.39 | 1990 | 1667 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 52.5% | +0.25 | 6–8 (43%) | 5–2 (71%) | 99.4 | +1.00 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1506 | 112.3 | — | — | — | — | +22 | +6 | — | 28.6% | -1.68 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.96 | 1991 | 1645 | 123.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -98 | — | 42.7% | -0.60 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.4 | -1.33 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1484 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | 36.4% | -1.09 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.45 | 1992 | 1606 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +1 | — | -25 | 43.3% | -0.63 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.3 | +1.85 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1505 | 113.7 | — | — | — | — | +44 | -3 | — | 44.4% | -0.80 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–0 | — | +0.37 | 1993 | 1601 | 124.1 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -41 | +10 | 42.3% | -0.62 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–4 (43%) | 97.9 | -0.38 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1519 | 109.0 | — | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | 38.5% | -1.08 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.15 | 1994 | 1585 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.19 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1551 | 111.6 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 44.4% | +0.07 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–4 (20%) | 95.2 | -0.10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1564 | 110.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 55.0% | +0.25 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +0.74 |
| Career | — | 1549 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | +44 | +16 | — | 35.4% | -1.22 | 16–12 (57%) | 6–5 (55%) | 108.7 | +2.42 | — | 1787 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -22 | -6 | 46.3% | -0.33 | 31–46 (40%) | 30–23 (57%) | 98.7 | +2.04 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 28, 1998 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 17, 1995 | H2H |
| Tatiana Panova | 2 | 0 | 2 | May 26, 1999 | H2H |
| Miriam Oremans | 1 | 1 | 2 | May 28, 1997 | H2H |
| Paola Suarez | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 17, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Bradtke | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 26, 1993 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 14, 1996 | H2H |
| Judith Wiesner | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Meredith Mcgrath | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 15, 1993 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 18, 1993 | H2H |