H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Ghirardi vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 1-0

Lea Ghirardi holds a 1–0 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Ghirardi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Ghirardi won the 1996 Amelia Island round of 64 7-6 6-1.

FRA Age 52 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Ghirardi #157 7-6 6-1 Ginger Helgeson #446 Match data Apr 10, 1996* R64 Amelia Island Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Ghirardi #597 #73 337 1,549 23 46 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ginger Helgeson #467 #29 246 1,865 94 95 49.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Ghirardi Ginger Helgeson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1993 1–4 20.0% #142 1,479 0 0
20 1994 2–5 28.6% #141 1,466 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% #239 1,485 0 0
21 1995 7–13 35.0% #103 1,483 0 0 1990 1–2 33.3% #246 1,498 0 0
22 1996 4–9 30.8% #142 1,505 0 0 1991 17–17 50.0% #58 1,647 0 0
23 1997 1–3 25.0% #124 1,483 0 0 1992 12–15 44.4% #71 1,648 0 0
24 1998 6–9 40.0% #122 1,504 0 0 1993 22–20 52.4% #54 1,736 0 0
25 1999 2–3 40.0% #152 1,518 0 0 1994 29–17 63.0% #30 1,777 0 1
26 1995 8–7 53.3% #111 1,772 0 1
27 1996 0–2 0.0% #792 1,721 0 1
28 1997 3–8 27.3% #167 1,639 0 1
29 1998 2–5 28.6% #152 1,572 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lea Ghirardi Ginger Helgeson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1993 1 4 5 20.0%
20 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 3 5 8 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1991 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1998 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 11 9 20 55.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 20 9 29 69.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1997 0 6 6 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 9 15 24 37.5% 13 25 38 34.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 55 50 105 52.4% 28 24 52 53.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 2 8 10 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Ghirardi Ginger Helgeson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1993 1479 114.7 +45 38.5% -0.08 0–3 (0%) 0–2 0.00
20 1994 1466 97.8 +75 25.0% -1.56 2–0 0–2 +0.27 1989 1486 104.0 0.0% -2.75 0–1 +0.02
21 1995 1484 102.7 +36 +35 34.0% -1.53 5–2 (71%) 2–0 +1.39 1990 1498 100.1 28.6% -2.00 1–0 -0.32
22 1996 1506 112.3 +22 +6 28.6% -1.68 2–0 1–0 -0.96 1991 1647 138.4 -14 +44 48.1% -0.22 6–3 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 106.2 -1.02
23 1997 1484 100.0 +23 36.4% -1.09 1–2 (33%) +0.45 1992 1649 128.8 +13 +33 -159 48.5% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 98.8 +0.26
24 1998 1505 113.7 +44 -3 44.4% -0.80 4–4 (50%) 2–0 +0.37 1993 1737 139.0 -44 -4 -162 52.6% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 1–2 (33%) -0.91
25 1999 1519 109.0 -22 38.5% -1.08 2–1 (67%) 1–1 +0.15 1994 1777 146.6 +6 -21 -203 61.0% +0.87 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 +1.21
26 1995 1773 137.3 -13 +12 60.0% +0.67 0–4 (0%) 0–2 -0.56
27 1996 1721 92.9 0.0% -3.50 0–1 +0.20
28 1997 1639 107.6 -14 -6 30.4% -1.22 0–1 -0.15
29 1998 1573 99.1 +16 41.2% -0.71 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 94.9 +1.00
Career 1549 111.5 +44 +16 35.4% -1.22 16–12 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 108.7 +2.42 1865 140.4 -9 +11 -127 50.6% +0.14 23–28 (45%) 18–17 (51%) 99.4 -0.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.