H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Pericoli vs Christiane Spinoza H2H: 1-0

Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Christiane Spinoza in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1969 Monte Carlo round of 32 8-6 6-1.

ITA Right-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Pericoli 8-6 6-1 Christiane Spinoza Match data Apr 19, 1969* R32 Monte Carlo WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Pericoli 1,772 58 51 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Christiane Spinoza 1,541 26 48 35.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Pericoli Christiane Spinoza
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 1968 7–17 29.2% 1,424 0 0
24 1969 6–13 31.6% 1,446 0 0
25 1970 9–16 36.0% 1,492 0 0
26 1971 4–2 66.7% 1,541 0 1
33 1968 8–5 61.5% 1,586 0 1
34 1969 15–7 68.2% 1,705 0 2
35 1970 11–7 61.1% 1,756 0 3
36 1971 9–8 52.9% 1,752 0 3
37 1972 3–6 33.3% 1,659 0 3
38 1973 4–3 57.1% 1,648 0 3
39 1974 6–6 50.0% 1,641 0 3
40 1975 2–7 22.2% 1,554 0 3
41 1976 0–2 0.0% 1,548 0 3

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Pericoli Christiane Spinoza
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 1968 1424 89.1 +136 -16 0 32.0% -1.52 4–4 (50%) -0.35
24 1969 1446 100.4 -10 -19 35.7% -1.48 1–3 (25%) -0.09
25 1970 1493 107.6 +22 -3 -41 39.6% -0.96 2–3 (40%) +0.44
26 1971 1541 122.2 +19 100.0% +4.75 +1.43
33 1968 1586 120.0 +5 +12 70.8% +1.92 1–1 +0.13
34 1969 1705 134.1 +26 67.3% +1.55 2–3 (40%) -1.00
35 1970 1757 135.6 -3 -150 60.5% +1.24 3–1 (75%) -0.73
36 1971 1752 125.6 +1 50.0% +0.08 3–1 (75%) -0.10
37 1972 1659 111.6 +28 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.57
38 1973 1648 114.4 +17 80.0% +2.50 +1.43
39 1974 1642 116.2 +20 51.7% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.98
40 1975 1555 100.4 +15 33.3% -1.19 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +1.40
41 1976 1548 102.8 0.0% -3.50 -0.12
Career 1773 132.2 +5 +14 -150 56.0% +0.67 12–14 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 +2.42 1541 102.8 +71 -6 -20 39.2% -0.99 7–10 (41%) +2.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.