H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Pericoli vs Florence Guedy H2H: 2-1

Lea Pericoli holds a 2–1 lead over Florence Guedy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lea Pericoli leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1974 Nice round of 16 6-3 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lea Pericoli
ITA Right-Handed
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Florence Guedy
FRA Age 71

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Pericoli 6-3 4-6 7-5 Florence Guedy Match data Apr 6, 1974* R16 Nice WTA 250 Clay
Florence Guedy 1-6 6-1 6-3 Lea Pericoli Match data Mar 2, 1974* QF Cairo WTA 250 Clay
Lea Pericoli 6-2 6-2 Florence Guedy Match data Mar 7, 1973* QF Cairo WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Pericoli — — — 1,772 58 51 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Florence Guedy — — — 1,600 32 58 35.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Pericoli Florence Guedy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,471 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,474 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1973 7–9 43.8% — 1,509 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1974 7–10 41.2% — 1,524 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1975 4–12 25.0% — 1,497 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1976 9–7 56.2% — 1,578 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1977 2–6 25.0% — 1,534 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1978 0–1 0.0% — — 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1979 2–3 40.0% — 1,518 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1980 0–3 0.0% — 1,481 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1981 0–4 0.0% — 1,428 0 1
33 1968 8–5 61.5% — 1,586 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1969 15–7 68.2% — 1,705 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 1970 11–7 61.1% — 1,756 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1971 9–8 52.9% — 1,752 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,659 0 3 — — — — — — —
38 1973 4–3 57.1% — 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —
39 1974 6–6 50.0% — 1,641 0 3 — — — — — — —
40 1975 2–7 22.2% — 1,554 0 3 — — — — — — —
41 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,548 0 3 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Pericoli Florence Guedy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1484 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1472 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.29
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1474 104.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.25 — — — +0.39
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1510 109.7 — — — — — -7 +45 42.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.90
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 115.3 — — — — +13 -10 — 46.2% -0.18 1–4 (20%) — — +1.30
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1498 106.1 — — — — +104 +4 — 34.3% -1.06 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +1.41
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1579 117.0 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% +0.25 4–0 (100%) 1–0 — +1.69
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1534 102.3 — — — — — +37 — 25.0% -1.94 — 0–1 — +0.67
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1519 102.8 — — — — — +28 — 46.2% -0.08 1–2 (33%) — — +0.69
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1481 95.7 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.09
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1428 98.4 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.38 0–2 0–2 — +0.19
33 1968 1586 120.0 — — — — +5 +12 — 70.8% +1.92 1–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1969 1705 134.1 — — — — — +26 — 67.3% +1.55 2–3 (40%) — — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1970 1757 135.6 — — — — — -3 -150 60.5% +1.24 3–1 (75%) — — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1971 1752 125.6 — — — — — +1 — 50.0% +0.08 3–1 (75%) — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1972 1659 111.6 — — — — — +28 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1973 1648 114.4 — — — — — +17 — 80.0% +2.50 — — — +1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1974 1642 116.2 — — — — — +20 — 51.7% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1975 1555 100.4 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -1.19 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1976 1548 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1773 132.2 — — — — +5 +14 -150 56.0% +0.67 12–14 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 +2.42 — 1601 111.7 — — — — +47 +9 +45 39.5% -0.65 8–15 (35%) 3–4 (43%) 94.7 +8.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.