H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lea Pericoli vs Florence Guedy H2H: 2-1
Lea Pericoli holds a 2–1 lead over Florence Guedy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lea Pericoli leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1974 Nice fourth round 6-3 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1974* | Nice | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lea Pericoli | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Florence Guedy | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1974* | Cairo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Florence Guedy | 1-6 6-1 6-3 | Lea Pericoli | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1973* | Cairo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Lea Pericoli | 6-2 6-2 | Florence Guedy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Pericoli | — | — | — | 1,764 | 58 | 51 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Florence Guedy | — | — | — | 1,596 | 32 | 58 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Pericoli | Florence Guedy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,418 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1968 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1969 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1970 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1973 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1974 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1975 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |