H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lea Pericoli vs Frances Maclennan H2H: 2-0
Lea Pericoli holds a 2–0 lead over Frances Maclennan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lea Pericoli leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1975 Gstaad fourth round 6-2 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 1975* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lea Pericoli | 6-2 9-7 | Frances Maclennan | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1969* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Lea Pericoli | 6-2 6-3 | Frances Maclennan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Pericoli | — | — | — | 1,764 | 58 | 51 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Frances Maclennan | — | — | — | 1,559 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Pericoli | Frances Maclennan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 17–26 | 39.5% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,392 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1968 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1969 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1970 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1973 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1974 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1975 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |