H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Pericoli vs Glenda Swan H2H: 1-0

Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Glenda Swan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1968 South African Open round of 16 6-1 6-0.

ITA Right-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Pericoli 6-1 6-0 Glenda Swan Match data Apr 5, 1968* R16 South African Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Pericoli 1,772 58 51 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Glenda Swan 1,556 6 6 50.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Pericoli Glenda Swan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1968 2–1 66.7% 1,514 0 0
23 1969 2–1 66.7% 1,536 0 0
24 1970 1–2 33.3% 1,532 0 0
25 1971 0–1 0.0% 1,530 0 0
26 1972 1–1 50.0% 1,536 0 0
33 1968 8–5 61.5% 1,586 0 1
34 1969 15–7 68.2% 1,705 0 2
35 1970 11–7 61.1% 1,756 0 3
36 1971 9–8 52.9% 1,752 0 3
37 1972 3–6 33.3% 1,659 0 3
38 1973 4–3 57.1% 1,648 0 3
39 1974 6–6 50.0% 1,641 0 3
40 1975 2–7 22.2% 1,554 0 3
41 1976 0–2 0.0% 1,548 0 3

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Pericoli Glenda Swan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 1968 1515 94.6 +45 50.0% -0.63 2–0 +0.07
23 1969 1537 105.3 +72 66.7% +1.00 0.00
24 1970 1532 110.2 +53 42.9% -0.28 0–1 +0.01
25 1971 1531 98.2 0.0% -3.50 -0.28
26 1972 1536 102.1 50.0% 0.00 -0.09
33 1968 1586 120.0 +5 +12 70.8% +1.92 1–1 +0.13
34 1969 1705 134.1 +26 67.3% +1.55 2–3 (40%) -1.00
35 1970 1757 135.6 -3 -150 60.5% +1.24 3–1 (75%) -0.73
36 1971 1752 125.6 +1 50.0% +0.08 3–1 (75%) -0.10
37 1972 1659 111.6 +28 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.57
38 1973 1648 114.4 +17 80.0% +2.50 +1.43
39 1974 1642 116.2 +20 51.7% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.98
40 1975 1555 100.4 +15 33.3% -1.19 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +1.40
41 1976 1548 102.8 0.0% -3.50 -0.12
Career 1773 132.2 +5 +14 -150 56.0% +0.67 12–14 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 +2.42 1556 104.2 +57 48.1% -0.30 2–1 (67%) -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.