H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Lea Pericoli vs Ingrid Bentzer H2H: 1-0
Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Ingrid Bentzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1971 Wimbledon first round 5-7 9-8 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1971* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Lea Pericoli | 5-7 9-8 6-4 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Pericoli | — | — | — | 1,764 | 58 | 51 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Pericoli | Ingrid Bentzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1968 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 1969 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 1970 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1973 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | 1974 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 |
| 40 | 1975 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |