H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lea Pericoli vs Maria Teresa Riedl H2H: 1-1

Lea Pericoli and Maria Teresa Riedl are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Maria Teresa Riedl won the 1969 Verona final 6-1 1-6 6-1.

ITA Right-Handed
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Teresa Riedl 6-1 1-6 6-1 Lea Pericoli Match data Sep 28, 1969* F Verona WTA 250 Clay
Lea Pericoli 7-5 4-6 6-0 Maria Teresa Riedl Match data Oct 2, 1968* F Milan Nationals WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lea Pericoli 1,772 58 51 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Maria Teresa Riedl 1,613 16 10 61.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lea Pericoli Maria Teresa Riedl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
30 1968 9–6 60.0% 1,572 0 1
31 1969 7–4 63.6% 1,613 0 2
33 1968 8–5 61.5% 1,586 0 1
34 1969 15–7 68.2% 1,705 0 2
35 1970 11–7 61.1% 1,756 0 3
36 1971 9–8 52.9% 1,752 0 3
37 1972 3–6 33.3% 1,659 0 3
38 1973 4–3 57.1% 1,648 0 3
39 1974 6–6 50.0% 1,641 0 3
40 1975 2–7 22.2% 1,554 0 3
41 1976 0–2 0.0% 1,548 0 3

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lea Pericoli Maria Teresa Riedl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
30 1968 1572 115.4 +57 62.5% +0.84 2–2 (50%) +0.30
31 1969 1613 115.6 +65 59.3% +0.93 3–2 (60%) +1.25
33 1968 1586 120.0 +5 +12 70.8% +1.92 1–1 +0.13
34 1969 1705 134.1 +26 67.3% +1.55 2–3 (40%) -1.00
35 1970 1757 135.6 -3 -150 60.5% +1.24 3–1 (75%) -0.73
36 1971 1752 125.6 +1 50.0% +0.08 3–1 (75%) -0.10
37 1972 1659 111.6 +28 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.57
38 1973 1648 114.4 +17 80.0% +2.50 +1.43
39 1974 1642 116.2 +20 51.7% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.98
40 1975 1555 100.4 +15 33.3% -1.19 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +1.40
41 1976 1548 102.8 0.0% -3.50 -0.12
Career 1773 132.2 +5 +14 -150 56.0% +0.67 12–14 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 +2.42 1613 115.5 +60 61.0% +0.88 5–4 (56%) +6.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.