H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Lea Pericoli vs Peaches Bartkowicz H2H: 0-1
Peaches Bartkowicz holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Pericoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peaches Bartkowicz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Peaches Bartkowicz won the 1969 Monte Carlo fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 77
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1969* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Peaches Bartkowicz | 6-3 6-4 | Lea Pericoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Pericoli | — | — | — | 1,764 | 58 | 51 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Peaches Bartkowicz | — | — | — | 1,973 | 118 | 59 | 66.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Pericoli | Peaches Bartkowicz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 22–9 | 71.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 48–13 | 78.7% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 39–17 | 69.6% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 12 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 1968 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1969 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1970 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1973 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1974 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1975 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |