Lea Pericoli
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Sherriff | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 28, 1974 | H2H |
| Olga Morozova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 25, 1971 | H2H |
| Odile De Roubin | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 13, 1974 | H2H |
| Florence Guedy | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 6, 1974 | H2H |
| Francoise Durr | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 10, 1971 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Lea Pericoli vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 1-0
Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Tory Ann Fretz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1971 Roland Garros round of 64 5-7 7-5 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Pericoli | 5-7 7-5 8-6 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data | May 24, 1971 | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Pericoli | — | — | — | 1,772 | 58 | 51 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,798 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lea Pericoli | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1968 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1969 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1970 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1973 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | 1974 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1975 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lea Pericoli | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 33 | 1968 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 34 | 1969 | — | — | — | — | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1973 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 51 | 44 | 95 | 53.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 28 | 18 | 46 | 60.9% | 37 | 35 | 72 | 51.4% | 24 | 23 | 47 | 51.1% | 13 | 23 | 36 | 36.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lea Pericoli | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1670 | 123.2 | — | — | — | — | -16 | -45 | +14 | 67.4% | +1.28 | 3–4 (43%) | — | — | +0.45 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1711 | 137.3 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +45 | -58 | 59.3% | +1.12 | 3–6 (33%) | — | — | -3.71 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1673 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | +62 | +24 | — | 50.0% | +0.46 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1736 | 141.5 | — | — | — | — | +56 | +6 | -129 | 47.2% | +0.02 | 7–4 (64%) | 2–3 (40%) | 103.4 | -2.20 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1697 | 139.0 | — | — | — | — | +90 | -44 | -100 | 38.5% | -0.75 | 0–7 (0%) | 3–1 (75%) | 93.7 | -3.05 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1726 | 127.7 | — | — | — | — | -15 | -78 | -58 | 41.3% | -0.50 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–0 | — | -1.80 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1720 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +1.00 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.27 |
| 33 | 1968 | 1586 | 120.0 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +12 | — | 70.8% | +1.92 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.13 | 1976 | 1726 | 119.3 | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | — | 36.8% | -1.84 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.55 |
| 34 | 1969 | 1705 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | 67.3% | +1.55 | 2–3 (40%) | — | — | -1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1970 | 1757 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | — | -3 | -150 | 60.5% | +1.24 | 3–1 (75%) | — | — | -0.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1971 | 1752 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +1 | — | 50.0% | +0.08 | 3–1 (75%) | — | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1972 | 1659 | 111.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | 38.1% | -0.48 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1973 | 1648 | 114.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | 80.0% | +2.50 | — | — | — | +1.43 | 1981 | 1701 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 39 | 1974 | 1642 | 116.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | 51.7% | +0.03 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.2 | +0.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1975 | 1555 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | 33.3% | -1.19 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–1 | — | +1.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1976 | 1548 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1773 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +14 | -150 | 56.0% | +0.67 | 12–14 (46%) | 3–3 (50%) | 96.6 | +2.42 | — | 1799 | 138.6 | — | — | — | — | +36 | 0 | -49 | 51.7% | +0.29 | 16–27 (37%) | 7–5 (58%) | 95.0 | -5.38 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Tory Ann Fretz
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosie Casals | 0 | 8 | 8 | Mar 28, 1974 | H2H |
| Valerie Ziegenfuss | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 10, 1974 | H2H |
| Kerry Reid | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 1974 | H2H |
| Laura Rossouw | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 21, 1973 | H2H |
| Karen Krantzcke | 2 | 3 | 5 | Aug 18, 1973 | H2H |