H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Leigh Anne Thompson vs Kate Gompert H2H: 0-1

Kate Gompert holds a 1–0 lead over Leigh Anne Thompson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1986 Wichita round of 16 6-0 2-6 6-2.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 63 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Gompert #30 6-0 2-6 6-2 Leigh Anne Thompson Match data Jan 24, 1986* R16 Wichita WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leigh Anne Thompson 1,792 42 73 36.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kate Gompert #316 #18 34 1,871 85 81 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leigh Anne Thompson Kate Gompert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1981 4–5 44.4% 1,542 0 0 1980 3–2 60.0% 1,538 0 0
18 1982 20–23 46.5% 1,765 0 1 1981 4–3 57.1% 1,583 0 0
19 1983 7–17 29.2% 1,715 0 1 1982 7–7 50.0% 1,588 0 0
20 1984 0–8 0.0% 1,589 0 1 1983 6–3 66.7% 1,672 0 0
21 1985 6–11 35.3% 1,594 0 1 1984 4–5 44.4% #98 1,651 0 0
22 1986 5–9 35.7% 1,555 0 1 1985 11–8 57.9% 1,724 0 0
23 1986 21–21 50.0% #35 1,781 0 0
24 1987 25–18 58.1% #22 1,830 0 0
26 1989 3–11 21.4% #175 1,659 0 0
27 1990 1–3 25.0% #301 1,621 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leigh Anne Thompson Kate Gompert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1982 7 2 9 77.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 1982 6 6 12 50.0%
20 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1983 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1986 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
24 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 16 25 41 39.0% 13 20 33 39.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 13 22 35 37.1% 37 38 75 49.3% 26 18 44 59.1% 0 6 6 0.0% 15 16 31 48.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leigh Anne Thompson Kate Gompert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1981 1543 110.4 +61 +27 47.6% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.41 1980 1539 117.9 60.0% +0.90 0–1 -0.24
18 1982 1765 135.1 +1 -160 -227 45.7% -0.04 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.7 -0.61 1981 1584 114.4 +12 60.0% +0.73 0–1 -0.14
19 1983 1715 134.4 +4 -84 38.8% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 1–1 -2.18 1982 1588 109.9 -24 56.0% +0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 +1.45
20 1984 1590 92.8 +12 -27 11.1% -2.33 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.15 1983 1673 129.7 -18 -62 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 +0.11
21 1985 1594 115.3 +21 36.8% -0.66 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) +0.16 1984 1651 117.2 -40 -19 50.0% +0.55 1–3 (25%) 1–0 +0.68
22 1986 1556 101.1 -8 -18 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 +1.93 1985 1725 135.5 -45 -15 60.0% +0.80 2–2 (50%) 1–0 +1.32
23 1986 1781 143.3 +2 -61 -244 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 100.8 -3.20
24 1987 1830 154.9 -15 +13 56.4% +0.64 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 -2.21
26 1989 1659 99.4 +9 +88 22.6% -1.94 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.02
27 1990 1622 106.2 +31 33.3% -1.00 +0.25
Career 1793 126.6 +9 -96 -227 40.5% -0.53 10–22 (31%) 9–13 (41%) 89.9 -0.39 1871 143.4 -12 -7 -244 51.7% +0.26 19–19 (50%) 8–16 (33%) 97.5 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.