H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Leila Meskhi vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 2-1
Leila Meskhi holds a 2–1 lead over Bettina Fulco in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1992 Rome fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1992* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 6-1 6-2 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
| May 2, 1990* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 6-2 2-0 (ret.) | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
| May 20, 1988* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 7-5 1-0 (ret.) | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leila Meskhi | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |