H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Leila Meskhi vs Debbie Graham H2H: 1-0
Leila Meskhi holds a 1–0 lead over Debbie Graham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1992 Hilton Head fourth round 3-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1992* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Debbie Graham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Debbie Graham | #729 | #35 | 190 | 1,756 | 83 | 90 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leila Meskhi | Debbie Graham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #138 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #256 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #121 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #65 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #122 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |