H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Leila Meskhi vs Grace Kim H2H: 1-0

Leila Meskhi holds a 1–0 lead over Grace Kim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1987 Little Rock round of 32 6-2 6-1.

GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leila Meskhi #109 6-2 6-1 Grace Kim Match data Nov 5, 1987* R32 Little Rock WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 1,987 193 121 61.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Grace Kim 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leila Meskhi Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 7–3 70.0% 1,585 0 1
15 1983 2–4 33.3% 1,591 0 1
16 1984 6–10 37.5% 1,622 0 1
17 1985 17–25 40.5% 1,694 0 1
18 1986 10–22 31.2% 1,605 0 1
19 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0 1987 5–13 27.8% 1,515 0 1
20 1988 18–18 50.0% #46 1,696 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% 1,469 0 1
21 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1
22 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3
23 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,936 0 4
24 1992 26–16 61.9% #22 1,928 0 4
25 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,871 0 4
26 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,842 0 4
27 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,832 0 5
28 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,746 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leila Meskhi Grace Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3%
19 1987 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1988 15 12 27 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1989 15 7 22 68.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1990 19 5 24 79.2% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1992 9 6 15 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1995 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 101 58 159 63.5% 64 39 103 62.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 25 16 41 61.0% 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leila Meskhi Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1586 114.0 +73 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42
15 1983 1592 115.9 +65 30.8% -1.00 1–0 -0.06
16 1984 1622 113.8 +26 +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48
17 1985 1694 125.2 +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64
18 1986 1605 117.7 +47 -126 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32
19 1987 1656 134.5 +27 -63 64.1% +1.05 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.80 1987 1515 97.7 +45 -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 +2.17
20 1988 1696 129.7 +32 -166 49.4% -0.23 8–5 (62%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +0.65 1988 1469 96.4 -61 0.0% -3.90 0–1 -0.26
21 1989 1795 139.4 +11 -135 59.2% +0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–0 (100%) 108.0 -1.90
22 1990 1928 151.0 +5 -112 -373 66.4% +1.63 10–3 (77%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +1.11
23 1991 1937 151.3 -20 +20 62.6% +0.74 9–4 (69%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +0.25
24 1992 1928 157.9 -26 +60 61.5% +1.16 7–4 (64%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -1.71
25 1993 1872 148.4 -2 +90 55.3% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 -1.93
26 1994 1843 148.6 -3 +108 55.2% +0.72 9–4 (69%) 3–3 (50%) 102.8 +0.52
27 1995 1833 120.0 0 73.3% +1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +0.23
28 1996 1747 89.2 0.0% -4.63 -0.21
Career 1987 152.8 +2 0 -270 58.9% +0.70 52–30 (63%) 28–33 (46%) 103.7 -0.70 1705 119.1 +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.