H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Leila Meskhi vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 0-1
Isabel Cueto holds a 1–0 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabel Cueto leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1987 Hamburg fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1987* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-3 6-3 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leila Meskhi | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |