H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Leila Meskhi vs Jane Thomas H2H: 1-0

Leila Meskhi holds a 1–0 lead over Jane Thomas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1988 Nashville round of 32 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Leila Meskhi
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jane Thomas
USA Age 60

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leila Meskhi #40 6-3 6-1 Jane Thomas Match data Oct 20, 1988* R32 Nashville WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 1,987 193 121 61.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jane Thomas — — — 1,500 0 4 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leila Meskhi Jane Thomas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1988 18–18 50.0% #46 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
22 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,462 0 0
23 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,936 0 4 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,449 0 0
24 1992 26–16 61.9% #22 1,928 0 4 — — — — — — —
25 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,871 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,842 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,832 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,746 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leila Meskhi Jane Thomas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1987 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 15 12 27 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 15 7 22 68.2% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1990 19 5 24 79.2% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1992 9 6 15 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1995 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 101 58 159 63.5% 64 39 103 62.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 25 16 41 61.0% — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leila Meskhi Jane Thomas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1987 1656 134.5 — — — — +27 -63 — 64.1% +1.05 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 1696 129.7 — — — — +32 — -166 49.4% -0.23 8–5 (62%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 1795 139.4 — — — — +11 -135 — 59.2% +0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–0 (100%) 108.0 -1.90 1987 1485 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12
22 1990 1928 151.0 — — — — +5 -112 -373 66.4% +1.63 10–3 (77%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +1.11 1988 1463 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.08
23 1991 1937 151.3 — — — — -20 +20 — 62.6% +0.74 9–4 (69%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +0.25 1989 1449 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17
24 1992 1928 157.9 — — — — -26 +60 — 61.5% +1.16 7–4 (64%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 1872 148.4 — — — — -2 +90 — 55.3% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 1843 148.6 — — — — -3 +108 — 55.2% +0.72 9–4 (69%) 3–3 (50%) 102.8 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1995 1833 120.0 — — — — 0 — — 73.3% +1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 1747 89.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.63 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1987 152.8 — — — — +2 0 -270 58.9% +0.70 52–30 (63%) 28–33 (46%) 103.7 -0.70 — 1500 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — +5.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.