H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Leila Meskhi vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 2-3

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 3–2 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1994 US Open fourth round 6-2 6-7 7-5.

GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 6, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-7 7-5 Leila Meskhi #37 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 7-6 7-5 Leila Meskhi #31 Match data
Aug 28, 1992* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Carpet Leila Meskhi #23 6-2 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jan 10, 1992* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Leila Meskhi #15 4-6 6-3 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Aug 15, 1991* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-1 Leila Meskhi #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 2,001 192 119 61.7% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Kimiko Date Krumm 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leila Meskhi Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 6–5 54.5% 1,562 0 0
19 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% 1,664 0 0
20 1988 17–17 50.0% #46 1,688 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% 1,725 0 0
21 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1 1992 26–13 66.7% 1,867 0 1
22 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3 1993 25–11 69.4% 1,956 0 2
23 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,937 0 4 1994 32–12 72.7% 1,987 0 4
24 1992 26–15 63.4% #22 1,939 0 4 1995 39–12 76.5% 2,029 0 5
25 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,874 0 4 1996 31–13 70.5% 2,071 0 7
26 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,843 0 4
27 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,834 0 5
28 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,748 0 5
37 2008 0–1 0.0% 2,042 0 7
38 2009 6–11 35.3% 1,841 0 8
39 2010 19–18 51.4% 1,814 0 8
40 2011 7–24 22.6% 1,567 0 8
41 2012 2–14 12.5% 1,454 0 8
42 2013 12–15 44.4% 1,575 0 8
43 2014 11–14 44.0% 1,597 0 8
44 2015 3–6 33.3% 1,574 0 8
46 2017 0–1 0.0% 1,564 0 8