H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Leila Meskhi vs Laura Arraya H2H: 3-1
Leila Meskhi holds a 3–1 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1991 US Open second round 6-4 3-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1991* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 6-4 3-6 6-0 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| May 4, 1990* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1989* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-4 6-4 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1989* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leila Meskhi | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |