H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Leila Meskhi vs Linda Ferrando H2H: 4-1

Leila Meskhi holds a 4–1 lead over Linda Ferrando in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Ferrando won the 1994 Sydney International round of 16 3-6 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Leila Meskhi
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main-draw meetings
Linda Ferrando
ITA Age 60 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Linda Ferrando #52 3-6 6-1 6-1 Leila Meskhi #37 Match data Jan 14, 1994* R16 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Leila Meskhi #20 1-6 7-6(8) 6-4 Linda Ferrando #72 Match data May 31, 1992* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Leila Meskhi #13 6-3 4-4 (ret.) Linda Ferrando #63 Match data Aug 22, 1991* R32 Washington Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Leila Meskhi #14 7-6 6-0 Linda Ferrando #90 Match data May 9, 1991* R32 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Leila Meskhi #21 7-6(4) 6-1 Linda Ferrando #82 Match data Sep 4, 1990* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 1,987 193 121 61.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Linda Ferrando #474 #36 42 1,734 87 101 46.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Leila Meskhi Linda Ferrando
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0 1985 2–2 50.0% #221 1,502 0 0
20 1988 18–18 50.0% #46 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1 1987 3–4 42.9% #154 1,536 0 0
22 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3 1988 11–12 47.8% #67 1,553 0 0
23 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,936 0 4 1989 16–15 51.6% #44 1,687 0 0
24 1992 26–16 61.9% #22 1,928 0 4 1990 14–17 45.2% #67 1,651 0 0
25 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,871 0 4 1991 9–12 42.9% #94 1,655 0 0
26 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,842 0 4 1992 11–13 45.8% #62 1,672 0 0
27 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,832 0 5 1993 13–13 50.0% #52 1,669 0 0
28 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,746 0 5 1994 8–12 40.0% #84 1,640 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #474 1,623 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Leila Meskhi Linda Ferrando
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1987 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1988 15 12 27 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 15 7 22 68.2% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
22 1990 19 5 24 79.2% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1988 5 3 8 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 7 7 14 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1992 9 6 15 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1990 6 6 12 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1995 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1996 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 101 58 159 63.5% 64 39 103 62.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 25 16 41 61.0% — 33 37 70 47.1% 48 47 95 50.5% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 9 13 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Leila Meskhi Linda Ferrando
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1987 1656 134.5 — — — — +27 -63 — 64.1% +1.05 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.80 1985 1502 98.7 — — — — — +63 — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.57
20 1988 1696 129.7 — — — — +32 — -166 49.4% -0.23 8–5 (62%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 1795 139.4 — — — — +11 -135 — 59.2% +0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–0 (100%) 108.0 -1.90 1987 1537 114.8 — — — — — +41 — 41.2% -0.59 2–1 (67%) — — -0.36
22 1990 1928 151.0 — — — — +5 -112 -373 66.4% +1.63 10–3 (77%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +1.11 1988 1554 116.4 — — — — +49 +13 — 50.9% -0.13 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 +1.49
23 1991 1937 151.3 — — — — -20 +20 — 62.6% +0.74 9–4 (69%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +0.25 1989 1687 142.3 — — — — -24 +1 — 49.3% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -1.31
24 1992 1928 157.9 — — — — -26 +60 — 61.5% +1.16 7–4 (64%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -1.71 1990 1652 129.9 — — — — -2 +38 — 47.9% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–5 (50%) 96.5 +0.69
25 1993 1872 148.4 — — — — -2 +90 — 55.3% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 -1.93 1991 1655 121.2 — — — — -44 +44 -94 42.6% -0.45 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -1.11
26 1994 1843 148.6 — — — — -3 +108 — 55.2% +0.72 9–4 (69%) 3–3 (50%) 102.8 +0.52 1992 1673 130.3 — — — — -78 +87 — 48.0% +0.32 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.73
27 1995 1833 120.0 — — — — 0 — — 73.3% +1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +0.23 1993 1669 123.5 — — — — -85 +93 — 50.8% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.05
28 1996 1747 89.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.63 — — — -0.21 1994 1641 131.6 — — — — +13 +33 — 38.6% -0.70 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) — -1.03
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1623 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.13
Career — 1987 152.8 — — — — +2 0 -270 58.9% +0.70 52–30 (63%) 28–33 (46%) 103.7 -0.70 — 1734 134.4 — — — — -21 +47 -94 47.1% -0.10 32–29 (52%) 11–19 (37%) 96.1 -0.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.