H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Leila Meskhi vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 0-1
Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 1–0 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1992 US Open second round 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 53
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Naoko Sawamatsu | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | #266 | #14 | 881 | 1,971 | 182 | 127 | 58.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leila Meskhi | Naoko Sawamatsu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #31 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #28 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #55 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |