H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Leila Meskhi vs Nicole Arendt H2H: 1-0
Leila Meskhi holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Arendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1992 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 6-1 6-2 | Nicole Arendt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Nicole Arendt | #433 | #49 | 487 | 1,776 | 67 | 75 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leila Meskhi | Nicole Arendt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #73 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #143 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |