H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lele Forood vs Anne Smith H2H: 1-0
Lele Forood holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lele Forood leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lele Forood won the 1979 Rome third round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1979* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Lele Forood | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Anne Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lele Forood | — | — | — | 1,684 | 54 | 96 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lele Forood | Anne Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1975 | 4–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1977 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1979 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1981 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1983 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |