H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lele Forood vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 1-1

Lele Forood and Betty Ann Grubb are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Betty Ann Grubb leads 1–0 on carpet, while Lele Forood leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lele Forood won the 1980 Wimbledon round of 32 6-2 2-6 6-3.

H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lele Forood 6-2 2-6 6-3 Betty Ann Grubb Match data Jun 29, 1980* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Betty Ann Grubb 7-5 3-6 6-4 Lele Forood Match data Sep 26, 1979* R32 Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lele Forood 1,685 54 96 36.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Betty Ann Grubb 1,824 124 112 52.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Lele Forood Betty Ann Grubb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1971 0–1 0.0% 1,481 0 0 1968 21–8 72.4% 1,633 0 2
1973 0–1 0.0% 1,477 0 0 1969 29–14 67.4% 1,777 0 4
1974 3–1 75.0% 1,514 0 0 1970 18–15 54.5% 1,684 0 4
1975 4–0 100.0% 1,573 0 1 1971 5–11 31.2% 1,679 0 4
1976 1–1 50.0% 1,575 0 1 1972 2–2 50.0% 1,673 0 5
1977 4–11 26.7% 1,553 0 1 1973 4–4 50.0% 1,699 0 6
1978 4–9 30.8% 1,613 0 1 1974 7–10 41.2% 1,675 0 6
1979 9–19 32.1% 1,637 0 1 1975 5–4 55.6% 1,728 0 6
1980 11–15 42.3% 1,639 0 1 1976 2–4 33.3% 1,683 0 6
1981 4–10 28.6% 1,594 0 1 1977 0–2 0.0% 1,652 0 6
1982 5–9 35.7% 1,567 0 1 1978 3–1 75.0% 1,660 0 6
1983 8–16 33.3% 1,554 0 1 1979 25–26 49.0% 1,816 0 6
1984 1–3 25.0% 1,525 0 1 1980 2–9 18.2% 1,721 0 6
1981 1–2 33.3% 1,709 0 6

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Lele Forood Betty Ann Grubb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1971 0 1 1 0.0% 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
1973 0 1 1 0.0% 1969 10 3 13 76.9% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
1974 3 1 4 75.0% 1970 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
1975 4 0 4 100.0% 1971 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
1976 1 1 2 50.0% 1972 0 2 2 0.0%
1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1973 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1978 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
1979 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1975 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
1980 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1981 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1982 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 8 9 17 47.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1983 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 12 27 39 30.8% 20 33 53 37.7% 16 21 37 43.2% 3 13 16 18.8% Career 52 38 90 57.8% 22 19 41 53.7% 33 28 61 54.1% 8 25 33 24.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Lele Forood Betty Ann Grubb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1971 1481 92.0 0.0% -5.00 +0.26 1968 1633 121.5 +94 +16 -113 69.8% +1.56 3–2 (60%) 0.00
1973 1477 101.4 0.0% -4.00 -0.13 1969 1777 129.3 +55 -18 64.1% +0.96 5–3 (63%) +1.73
1974 1514 108.8 +84 70.0% +2.10 1–1 0–1 +0.81 1970 1685 118.2 +114 -50 +6 53.4% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 1–0 +0.50
1975 1574 116.6 +19 88.9% +3.67 1–0 +1.20 1971 1680 131.9 +54 -42 +16 25.0% -1.81 2–0 0–2 -2.09
1976 1575 102.1 50.0% -0.67 1–1 1–0 +0.33 1972 1673 104.5 50.0% 0.00 -0.16
1977 1553 117.1 +72 -20 32.4% -1.12 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) +0.65 1973 1700 124.2 +39 47.1% -0.35 1–0 0–1 +0.31
1978 1613 126.6 +38 -22 37.5% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–1 -1.76 1974 1676 118.4 -14 -33 47.2% +0.08 1–3 (25%) 0–5 (0%) 92.5 -0.32
1979 1637 136.3 -16 -51 -18 36.5% -0.71 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.76 1975 1728 114.2 +19 47.4% -0.31 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 +0.34
1980 1640 121.5 -90 -73 +22 43.3% -0.73 4–4 (50%) -1.69 1976 1684 105.1 +18 33.3% -0.58 0–2 +0.77
1981 1594 117.9 -34 0 +55 31.0% -0.76 0–1 1–4 (20%) +0.15 1977 1653 100.1 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–1 +0.17
1982 1568 115.6 -55 -16 35.5% -1.23 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.8 +0.59 1978 1660 112.4 75.0% +2.63 +0.35
1983 1554 109.5 -24 -10 +102 33.3% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 +0.64 1979 1817 140.6 -45 -172 -41 45.3% -0.42 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 106.5 -0.93
1984 1525 92.2 28.6% -2.00 1–0 +0.57 1980 1722 127.1 -73 +67 33.3% -1.07 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.6 -1.30
1981 1709 110.6 -33 33.3% -0.50 0–1 -0.04
Career 1686 126.7 -17 -26 +44 38.3% -0.83 23–22 (51%) 9–17 (35%) 97.8 -0.09 Career 1825 133.9 +19 -51 -20 51.1% +0.14 32–23 (58%) 9–20 (31%) 97.8 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.