H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Lele Forood vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 1-1
Lele Forood and Betty Ann Grubb are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Betty Ann Grubb leads 1–0 on carpet, while Lele Forood leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lele Forood won the 1980 Wimbledon third round 6-2 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1980* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Lele Forood | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1979* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Betty Ann Grubb | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Lele Forood | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lele Forood | — | — | — | 1,684 | 54 | 96 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lele Forood | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1974 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1975 | 4–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1977 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| 1978 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 1979 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 1980 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 1981 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| 1983 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |