H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lele Forood vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 1-0
Lele Forood holds a 1–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lele Forood leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lele Forood won the 1983 US Open first round 7-6 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 69
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lele Forood | 7-6 1-6 6-2 | Heather Ludloff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lele Forood | — | — | — | 1,684 | 54 | 96 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lele Forood | Heather Ludloff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 4–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |