H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lele Forood vs Iris Riedel Kuhn H2H: 0-1
Iris Riedel Kuhn holds a 1–0 lead over Lele Forood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iris Riedel Kuhn leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iris Riedel Kuhn won the 1977 Indianapolis third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1977* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Iris Riedel Kuhn | 6-3 6-3 | Lele Forood | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lele Forood | — | — | — | 1,684 | 54 | 96 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Iris Riedel Kuhn | — | — | — | 1,845 | 104 | 96 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lele Forood | Iris Riedel Kuhn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1975 | 4–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 28–9 | 75.7% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 7 |