H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lele Forood vs Katja Ebbinghaus H2H: 0-1

Katja Ebbinghaus holds a 1–0 lead over Lele Forood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katja Ebbinghaus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Katja Ebbinghaus won the 1977 Kitzbuhel round of 32 4-6 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lele Forood
USA Age 70
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Katja Ebbinghaus
FRG Age 78

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Katja Ebbinghaus 4-6 6-4 7-5 Lele Forood Match data Jul 14, 1977* R32 Kitzbuhel WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lele Forood — — — 1,685 54 96 36.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Katja Ebbinghaus — — — 1,878 179 146 55.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lele Forood Katja Ebbinghaus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1974 3–1 75.0% — 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1975 4–0 100.0% — 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,575 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1977 4–11 26.7% — 1,553 0 1 1968 4–6 40.0% — 1,493 0 0
21 1978 4–9 30.8% — 1,613 0 1 1969 10–9 52.6% — 1,559 0 0
22 1979 9–19 32.1% — 1,637 0 1 1970 4–5 44.4% — 1,577 0 0
23 1980 11–15 42.3% — 1,639 0 1 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,592 0 0
24 1981 4–10 28.6% — 1,594 0 1 1972 24–12 66.7% — 1,832 0 2
25 1982 5–9 35.7% — 1,567 0 1 1973 16–14 53.3% — 1,814 0 2
26 1983 8–16 33.3% — 1,554 0 1 1974 19–17 52.8% — 1,779 0 3
27 1984 1–3 25.0% — 1,525 0 1 1975 19–14 57.6% — 1,838 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1976 10–9 52.6% — 1,765 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1977 26–14 65.0% — 1,819 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1978 6–16 27.3% — 1,690 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1979 3–4 42.9% — 1,652 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,710 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1981 3–5 37.5% — 1,672 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 1982 3–1 75.0% — 1,679 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lele Forood Katja Ebbinghaus
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1968 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1969 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
22 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1970 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1971 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 2 1 3 66.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 0 3 3 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 0 3 100.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 27 39 30.8% 20 33 53 37.7% 16 21 37 43.2% 3 13 16 18.8% — 4 11 15 26.7% 132 88 220 60.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 15 17 32 46.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lele Forood Katja Ebbinghaus
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1481 92.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1477 101.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1514 108.8 — — — — — — +84 70.0% +2.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1574 116.6 — — — — — +19 — 88.9% +3.67 1–0 — — +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 1575 102.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 1–0 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1553 117.1 — — — — +72 -20 — 32.4% -1.12 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.65 1968 1494 106.8 — — — — — -1 — 47.8% -0.30 0–3 (0%) — — -0.04
21 1978 1613 126.6 — — — — +38 — -22 37.5% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -1.76 1969 1559 120.0 — — — — +58 -14 — 53.5% +0.37 2–3 (40%) — — +0.60
22 1979 1637 136.3 — — — — -16 -51 -18 36.5% -0.71 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.76 1970 1577 112.4 — — — — — +12 — 42.9% -0.48 2–1 (67%) — — +0.41
23 1980 1640 121.5 — — — — -90 -73 +22 43.3% -0.73 4–4 (50%) — — -1.69 1971 1593 120.8 — — — — — -4 -15 54.3% +0.37 1–7 (13%) — — +1.77
24 1981 1594 117.9 — — — — -34 0 +55 31.0% -0.76 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.15 1972 1832 145.6 — — — — -229 +82 -272 65.5% +0.91 5–7 (42%) 0–2 — -2.05
25 1982 1568 115.6 — — — — -55 -16 — 35.5% -1.23 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.8 +0.59 1973 1815 136.7 — — — — -146 +69 — 54.9% +0.10 4–7 (36%) 2–0 — -2.33
26 1983 1554 109.5 — — — — -24 -10 +102 33.3% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 +0.64 1974 1780 126.8 — — — — -223 +72 -178 56.0% +0.31 3–4 (43%) 6–3 (67%) 99.3 -0.63
27 1984 1525 92.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.57 1975 1839 139.4 — — — — — +58 — 56.0% +0.24 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 103.7 -1.26
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1765 129.1 — — — — — +92 -152 51.2% +0.30 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 +0.17
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1820 138.1 — — — — -237 +104 -212 60.2% +0.77 9–4 (69%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 +0.76
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1690 126.2 — — — — -129 +163 -112 33.3% -1.17 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.8 -1.71
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1653 108.5 — — — — -66 — — 43.8% -0.63 1–1 1–0 — +1.23
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1711 128.6 — — — — — +76 — 62.3% +1.20 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +1.51
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1673 109.0 — — — — — +131 — 53.8% +0.69 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +1.16
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1680 106.2 — — — — — +114 — 75.0% +1.50 — — — +0.69
Career — 1686 126.7 — — — — -17 -26 +44 38.3% -0.83 23–22 (51%) 9–17 (35%) 97.8 -0.09 — 1878 138.4 — — — — -149 +67 -146 55.2% +0.35 47–53 (47%) 20–20 (50%) 97.1 +0.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.