H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lele Forood vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-0

Lele Forood holds a 1–0 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lele Forood leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lele Forood won the 1976 US Open round of 128 5-7 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lele Forood
USA Age 70
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lele Forood 5-7 7-5 7-5 Mareen Louie Harper Match data Sep 3, 1976* R128 US Open Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lele Forood — — — 1,685 54 96 36.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,910 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lele Forood Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1974 3–1 75.0% — 1,514 0 0 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0
18 1975 4–0 100.0% — 1,573 0 1 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,568 0 0
19 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,575 0 1 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,714 0 0
20 1977 4–11 26.7% — 1,553 0 1 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0
21 1978 4–9 30.8% — 1,613 0 1 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0
22 1979 9–19 32.1% — 1,637 0 1 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,671 0 0
23 1980 11–15 42.3% — 1,639 0 1 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1
24 1981 4–10 28.6% — 1,594 0 1 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,776 0 2
25 1982 5–9 35.7% — 1,567 0 1 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,679 0 2
26 1983 8–16 33.3% — 1,554 0 1 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 1984 1–3 25.0% — 1,525 0 1 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,536 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lele Forood Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1971 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 1973 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1974 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1975 — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 27 39 30.8% 20 33 53 37.7% 16 21 37 43.2% 3 13 16 18.8% — 104 118 222 46.8% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lele Forood Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
14 1971 1481 92.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.36
16 1973 1477 101.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.13 1977 1520 116.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 1974 1514 108.8 — — — — — — +84 70.0% +2.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.81 1978 1589 122.4 — — — — +31 -31 — 34.1% -1.25 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) 108.1 -0.33
18 1975 1574 116.6 — — — — — +19 — 88.9% +3.67 1–0 — — +1.20 1979 1568 121.3 — — — — +25 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.42
19 1976 1575 102.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 1–0 — +0.33 1980 1714 128.5 — — — — -41 -153 -36 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.6 +1.57
20 1977 1553 117.1 — — — — +72 -20 — 32.4% -1.12 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.65 1981 1743 134.3 — — — — -2 — -72 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 -1.63
21 1978 1613 126.6 — — — — +38 — -22 37.5% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -1.76 1982 1655 124.8 — — — — -27 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.27
22 1979 1637 136.3 — — — — -16 -51 -18 36.5% -0.71 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.76 1983 1671 132.0 — — — — -14 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.4 -0.99
23 1980 1640 121.5 — — — — -90 -73 +22 43.3% -0.73 4–4 (50%) — — -1.69 1984 1733 127.5 — — — — +24 — -94 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.67
24 1981 1594 117.9 — — — — -34 0 +55 31.0% -0.76 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.15 1985 1777 143.7 — — — — +52 — -157 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.01
25 1982 1568 115.6 — — — — -55 -16 — 35.5% -1.23 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.8 +0.59 1986 1680 121.2 — — — — +20 — -65 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.39
26 1983 1554 109.5 — — — — -24 -10 +102 33.3% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 +0.64 1987 1624 119.5 — — — — +6 — -17 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.33
27 1984 1525 92.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.57 1988 1614 129.1 — — — — +11 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.29
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1576 117.3 — — — — -17 — -21 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.33
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1590 128.4 — — — — +10 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.4 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1686 126.7 — — — — -17 -26 +44 38.3% -0.83 23–22 (51%) 9–17 (35%) 97.8 -0.09 — 1911 135.2 — — — — +7 -78 -59 42.4% -0.57 76–56 (58%) 40–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.