H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lele Forood vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 0-3

Mima Jausovec holds a 3–0 lead over Lele Forood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1981 Tokyo Sillook third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lele Forood
Age 69
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 69 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 17, 1981* Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 R32 Carpet Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-2 Lele Forood Match data
Aug 14, 1978 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mima Jausovec 6-2 2-6 6-3 Lele Forood Match data
Jun 15, 1978* Chichester WTA 250 R32 Grass Mima Jausovec 6-0 4-6 6-2 Lele Forood Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lele Forood — — — 1,684 54 96 36.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,088 339 246 57.9% 1 1 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lele Forood Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1974 3–1 75.0% — 1,514 0 0 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,790 0 1
18 1975 4–0 100.0% — 1,573 0 1 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,804 0 1
19 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,575 0 1 1976 33–16 67.3% — 1,996 0 4
20 1977 4–11 26.7% — 1,552 0 1 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,008 1 5
21 1978 4–9 30.8% — 1,612 0 1 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,922 1 6
22 1979 9–19 32.1% — 1,634 0 1 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,866 1 6
23 1980 11–15 42.3% — 1,638 0 1 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,941 1 6
24 1981 4–10 28.6% — 1,592 0 1 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,010 1 6
25 1982 5–9 35.7% — 1,567 0 1 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,861 1 7
26 1983 8–16 33.3% — 1,555 0 1 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
27 1984 1–3 25.0% — 1,526 0 1 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 — — — — — — — 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7