H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Lele Forood vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 0-3

Mima Jausovec holds a 3–0 lead over Lele Forood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1981 Tokyo Sillook round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lele Forood
USA Age 70
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-2 Lele Forood Match data Sep 17, 1981* R32 Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-2 2-6 6-3 Lele Forood Match data Aug 17, 1978* R32 Canadian Open WTA 250 Hard
Mima Jausovec 6-0 4-6 6-2 Lele Forood Match data Jun 15, 1978* R32 Chichester WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lele Forood — — — 1,682 55 97 36.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lele Forood Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1974 3–1 75.0% — 1,514 0 0 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 1975 4–0 100.0% — 1,573 0 1 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,575 0 1 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4
20 1977 4–11 26.7% — 1,553 0 1 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1978 4–9 30.8% — 1,613 0 1 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1979 9–19 32.1% — 1,637 0 1 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6
23 1980 12–16 42.9% — 1,637 0 1 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6
24 1981 4–10 28.6% — 1,593 0 1 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6
25 1982 5–9 35.7% — 1,567 0 1 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7
26 1983 8–16 33.3% — 1,554 0 1 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7
27 1984 1–3 25.0% — 1,525 0 1 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7
28 — — — — — — — 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7
29 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lele Forood Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1973 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1974 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1975 — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 27 39 30.8% 20 33 53 37.7% 16 21 37 43.2% 4 14 18 22.2% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lele Forood Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1481 92.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 1973 1477 101.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.13 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17
17 1974 1514 108.8 — — — — — — +84 70.0% +2.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.81 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15
18 1975 1574 116.6 — — — — — +19 — 88.9% +3.67 1–0 — — +1.14 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20
19 1976 1575 102.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 1–0 — +0.32 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08
20 1977 1553 117.3 — — — — +73 -21 — 32.4% -1.12 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.53 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46
21 1978 1614 126.7 — — — — +34 — -23 37.5% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -1.91 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09
22 1979 1638 136.4 — — — — -17 -51 -18 36.5% -0.71 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.32 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01
23 1980 1638 120.3 — — — — -89 -71 +26 43.8% -0.64 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.9 -1.01 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84
24 1981 1593 118.2 — — — — -35 +1 +56 31.0% -0.76 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.28 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23
25 1982 1568 115.7 — — — — -58 -16 — 35.5% -1.23 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.8 +0.53 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20
26 1983 1554 109.7 — — — — -26 -11 +102 33.3% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 +0.61 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60
27 1984 1526 92.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.56 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
Career — 1683 126.6 — — — — -21 -26 +45 38.5% -0.81 23–22 (51%) 10–19 (34%) 97.3 +0.44 — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.