H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lele Forood vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 0-1

Pilar Vasquez holds a 1–0 lead over Lele Forood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pilar Vasquez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pilar Vasquez won the 1982 Indianapolis round of 64 6-4 6-2.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
PER Age 63 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pilar Vasquez 6-4 6-2 Lele Forood Match data Aug 4, 1982* R64 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lele Forood 1,685 54 96 36.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pilar Vasquez #772 #66 8 1,799 94 130 42.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lele Forood Pilar Vasquez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% 1,481 0 0
16 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,477 0 0
17 1974 3–1 75.0% 1,514 0 0 1980 15–0 100.0% 1,695 0 3
18 1975 4–0 100.0% 1,573 0 1 1981 22–11 66.7% 1,708 0 4
19 1976 1–1 50.0% 1,575 0 1 1982 11–14 44.0% 1,623 0 4
20 1977 4–11 26.7% 1,553 0 1 1983 11–14 44.0% 1,612 0 4
21 1978 4–9 30.8% 1,613 0 1 1984 7–17 29.2% #116 1,543 0 4
22 1979 9–19 32.1% 1,637 0 1 1985 1–12 7.7% #116 1,438 0 4
23 1980 11–15 42.3% 1,639 0 1 1986 2–9 18.2% #149 1,408 0 4
24 1981 4–10 28.6% 1,594 0 1 1987 8–11 42.1% #151 1,481 0 4
25 1982 5–9 35.7% 1,567 0 1 1988 6–12 33.3% #161 1,510 0 4
26 1983 8–16 33.3% 1,554 0 1 1989 4–9 30.8% #194 1,497 0 4
27 1984 1–3 25.0% 1,525 0 1 1990 5–10 33.3% #151 1,473 0 4
28 1991 1–10 9.1% #306 1,408 0 4
30 1993 1–1 50.0% #292 1,421 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lele Forood Pilar Vasquez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1973 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1974 3 1 4 75.0% 1980 15 0 15 100.0%
18 1975 4 0 4 100.0% 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
19 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
20 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
24 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1991 0 7 7 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 1993 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 12 27 39 30.8% 20 33 53 37.7% 16 21 37 43.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 34 59 93 36.6% 37 51 88 42.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lele Forood Pilar Vasquez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1481 92.0 0.0% -5.00 +0.26
16 1973 1477 101.4 0.0% -4.00 -0.13
17 1974 1514 108.8 +84 70.0% +2.10 1–1 0–1 +0.81 1980 1696 133.9 +93 100.0% +3.97 1–0 +2.78
18 1975 1574 116.6 +19 88.9% +3.67 1–0 +1.20 1981 1709 135.2 -147 +84 64.9% +1.14 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.3 -0.42
19 1976 1575 102.1 50.0% -0.67 1–1 1–0 +0.33 1982 1623 111.1 -51 +27 44.8% -0.50 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) +1.03
20 1977 1553 117.1 +72 -20 32.4% -1.12 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) +0.65 1983 1612 111.0 +15 +14 44.1% -0.47 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.9 +3.38
21 1978 1613 126.6 +38 -22 37.5% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–1 -1.76 1984 1544 104.4 +13 -1 35.2% -1.17 1–5 (17%) 4–1 (80%) 98.6 +0.59
22 1979 1637 136.3 -16 -51 -18 36.5% -0.71 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.76 1985 1438 95.2 +88 +8 20.0% -2.73 0–4 (0%) +0.36
23 1980 1640 121.5 -90 -73 +22 43.3% -0.73 4–4 (50%) -1.69 1986 1408 94.9 +93 -5 25.0% -2.33 0–2 +0.42
24 1981 1594 117.9 -34 0 +55 31.0% -0.76 0–1 1–4 (20%) +0.15 1987 1482 106.8 +84 -100 45.7% -0.30 3–5 (38%) 1–0 +1.44
25 1982 1568 115.6 -55 -16 35.5% -1.23 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.8 +0.59 1988 1510 111.3 +17 -101 39.5% -0.95 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) +0.40
26 1983 1554 109.5 -24 -10 +102 33.3% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 +0.64 1989 1498 108.0 -7 33.3% -1.07 2–2 (50%) 0–2 +0.62
27 1984 1525 92.2 28.6% -2.00 1–0 +0.57 1990 1474 96.8 +14 -57 36.4% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 +1.73
28 1991 1409 98.9 +1 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) +0.15
30 1993 1422 97.4 40.0% -1.40 1–0 +0.13
Career 1686 126.7 -17 -26 +44 38.3% -0.83 23–22 (51%) 9–17 (35%) 97.8 -0.09 1800 115.2 +17 +22 44.4% -0.47 24–39 (38%) 18–16 (53%) 97.2 +5.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.