H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lele Forood vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 0-1
Pilar Vasquez holds a 1–0 lead over Lele Forood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pilar Vasquez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pilar Vasquez won the 1982 Indianapolis second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 1982* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Pilar Vasquez | 6-4 6-2 | Lele Forood | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lele Forood | — | — | — | 1,684 | 54 | 96 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lele Forood | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1975 | 4–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1977 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1979 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1981 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1983 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |