H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 0-1

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 1–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2011 Budapest round of 16 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anabel Medina Garrigues #43 6-2 7-5 Lesia Tsurenko #129 Match data Jul 8, 2011* R16 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,834 310 278 52.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,562 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2004 25–23 52.1% #39 1,708 0 2
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,744 0 4
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,689 0 6
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,682 0 7
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0 2008 41–25 62.1% #22 1,819 0 8
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,567 0 9
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,783 0 11
29 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4 2012 23–26 46.9% #50 1,618 0 11
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,541 0 11
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,491 0 11
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — — — — —
21 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 21 15 36 58.3% 18 7 25 72.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 19 18 37 51.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 4 13 17 23.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 8 13 21 38.1% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1% — — — — — 125 149 274 45.6% 168 99 267 62.9% 15 21 36 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's and 326/508 of Anabel Medina Garrigues's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6% 2004 6/48 1.8 0.7 78.0% 58.3% 59.5% 62.0% 59.9% 58.6% 46.3%
22 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4% 2005 5/51 2.2 1.8 64.4% 56.8% 36.3% 52.9% 45.1% 49.6% 48.6%
23 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7% 2006 24/58 0.8 1.8 61.8% 56.1% 49.6% 49.2% 58.3% 53.5% 44.6%
24 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8% 2007 42/47 1.2 1.7 62.3% 63.3% 47.4% 49.5% 51.9% 57.3% 44.3%
25 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5% 2008 51/66 1.1 1.0 67.2% 61.0% 52.7% 53.2% 53.7% 58.3% 47.3%
26 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8% 2009 47/59 1.1 1.7 65.4% 63.4% 45.4% 46.8% 51.9% 56.9% 46.0%
27 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5% 2010 40/43 1.1 1.8 63.9% 59.5% 46.7% 50.2% 45.9% 54.8% 46.0%
28 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4% 2011 44/56 0.7 1.0 66.7% 62.3% 49.9% 48.2% 55.5% 58.3% 49.6%
29 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0% 2012 46/49 1.5 1.3 64.2% 60.7% 46.8% 54.9% 42.5% 55.9% 42.8%
30 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8% 2013 19/27 1.9 2.3 63.2% 61.4% 43.9% 45.3% 45.3% 55.3% 44.7%
31 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8% 2014 2/4 0.5 2.0 65.9% 56.8% 23.0% 63.9% 25.0% 45.3% 36.3%
32 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7% — 326/588 1.2 1.5 64.9% 61.1% 48.0% 50.5% 50.6% 56.5% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1495 109.4 — — — — — +46 — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 0–1 — -0.45
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1563 117.3 — — — — -85 +93 — 48.8% +0.08 4–10 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 93.0 +0.66
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1688 129.0 — — — — -48 — — 75.0% +1.87 2–0 0–1 — +0.26
20 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15 2003 1613 108.3 — — — — 0 +20 — 49.2% +0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 +1.71
21 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08 2004 1708 129.8 +1.41 +0.60 1.118 51.8% -57 +9 -121 53.7% +0.07 6–8 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 98.9 -1.46
22 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34 2005 1745 135.2 -1.51 +1.69 0.965 49.2% -99 +158 -209 53.6% +0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.7 -2.02
23 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05 2006 1689 128.8 -1.72 -0.23 0.958 49.1% -75 +209 -104 55.6% +0.38 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 +2.64
24 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31 2007 1682 135.1 +0.95 +0.79 1.039 50.5% -106 +315 — 53.6% +0.32 7–11 (39%) 8–3 (73%) 98.9 +0.01
25 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32 2008 1820 137.4 +2.98 +3.19 1.133 52.6% -59 +96 -278 58.5% +0.61 11–11 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 97.9 -0.46
26 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25 2009 1684 126.3 +0.93 +1.02 1.069 51.3% -23 +170 -48 52.7% +0.20 11–6 (65%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 +2.67
27 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38 2010 1568 122.5 -1.00 +1.31 1.018 50.4% -21 +188 — 44.7% -0.10 4–8 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.63
28 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57 2011 1783 138.0 +2.59 +4.74 1.189 53.8% -112 +101 — 61.8% +0.86 2–8 (20%) 6–7 (46%) 94.4 -1.92
29 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69 2012 1619 120.1 +0.13 -0.99 0.970 49.5% -31 +157 -55 49.1% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 97.5 +1.56
30 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24 2013 1542 118.6 -0.14 +0.99 1.001 49.5% -27 +153 -29 38.7% -0.87 2–10 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 91.4 -1.16
31 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91 2014 1491 90.1 -2.24 -1.41 0.663 41.1% — — — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — +0.24
32 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84 — 1834 132.6 +0.82 +1.48 1.053 51.0% -62 +135 -114 52.6% +0.21 79–99 (44%) 54–55 (50%) 94.1 +0.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.