H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Barbora Strycova H2H: 1-3

Barbora Strycova holds a 3–1 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Barbora Strycova leads 3–0 on grass, while Lesia Tsurenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2019 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
UKR Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 3, 2019* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Barbora Strycova #54 6-3 6-2 Lesia Tsurenko #33 Match data
Jul 5, 2018* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Barbora Strycova #23 6-1 6-4 Lesia Tsurenko #34 Match data
Jun 23, 2018* Birmingham WTA 500 QF Grass Barbora Strycova #24 7-5 3-0 (ret.) Lesia Tsurenko #37 Match data
Aug 28, 2015* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Lesia Tsurenko #46 6-3 6-0 Barbora Strycova #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #370 #23 2,030 1,889 180 200 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 286 297 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Barbora Strycova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 14–15 48.3% #57 1,562 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,490 0 0
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,477 0 0
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,456 0 0
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,485 0 0 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,524 0 0
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,507 0 0 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,511 0 0 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,738 0 1 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1
27 2016 19–19 50.0% #57 1,728 0 2 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,699 0 3 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1
29 2018 26–18 59.1% #27 1,814 0 4 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,734 0 4 2016 35–23 60.3% #20 1,791 0 1
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,746 0 4 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,868 0 2
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,738 0 4 2018 23–22 51.1% #33 1,765 0 2
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,745 0 4 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,713 0 2
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,866 0 4 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,693 0 4 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,602 0 2