H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Camila Giorgi H2H: 0-1

Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2014 Moscow round of 32 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camila Giorgi #39 6-0 6-3 Lesia Tsurenko #97 Match data Oct 16, 2014* R32 Moscow Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Camila Giorgi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2
27 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2
29 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Camila Giorgi
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
24 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
26 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
32 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
33 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1% — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's and 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Camila Giorgi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5%
20 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6% 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4%
21 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6% 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7%
22 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4% 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8%
23 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7% 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9%
24 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8% 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1%
25 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5% 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1%
26 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8% 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6%
27 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5% 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3%
28 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4% 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2%
29 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0% 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1%
30 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8% 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5%
31 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8% 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1%
32 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3% 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4%
33 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7% — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Camila Giorgi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
20 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04
21 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -0.04
22 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 +0.57
23 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -0.69
24 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -2.53
25 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32 2017 1760 124.4 +1.05 -0.11 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) 106.2 -1.25
26 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.5 -0.86
27 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.3 -0.70
28 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 -0.95
29 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.02
30 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) 93.9 +0.10
31 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.9 -1.28
32 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16
33 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84 — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.