H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Carla Suárez Navarro H2H: 2-2
Lesia Tsurenko and Carla Suárez Navarro are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Lesia Tsurenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carla Suárez Navarro won the 2018 Montreal third round 6-4 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 37
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2018* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Carla Suárez Navarro | 6-4 3-2 (ret.) | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2017* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-3 7-6(12) | Carla Suárez Navarro | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2015* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Carla Suárez Navarro | 6-3 (ret.) | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2012* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lesia Tsurenko | 7-5 6-0 | Carla Suárez Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | #342 | #6 | 4,015 | 2,022 | 339 | 247 | 57.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Carla Suárez Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #17 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |