H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Kateryna Volodko H2H: 1-2
Kateryna Volodko holds a 2–1 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kateryna Volodko leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kateryna Volodko won the 2016 Indian Wells third round 3-6 6-4 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 39
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2016* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Kateryna Volodko | 3-6 6-4 7-6(7) | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2015* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 7-6(13) 7-5 | Kateryna Volodko | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2011* | Baku | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kateryna Volodko | 6-3 6-2 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Kateryna Volodko | #584 | #29 | 1,740 | 1,801 | 137 | 187 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Kateryna Volodko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #384 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #44 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #31 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #99 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #92 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #132 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1168 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #285 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #207 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #584 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |