H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Klara Koukalova H2H: 0-1
Klara Koukalova holds a 1–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Klara Koukalova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Klara Koukalova won the 2012 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 44
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Klara Koukalova | 6-2 6-1 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Klara Koukalova | #566 | #20 | 1,860 | 1,807 | 275 | 285 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Klara Koukalova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #63 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #46 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #35 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #117 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #90 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #40 | 1,611 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,572 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,499 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |