H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 1-2
Lucie Safarova holds a 2–1 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2015 US Open first round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-4 6-1 | Lucie Safarova | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2015* | New Haven | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 6-2 7-6(4) | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Lucie Safarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |