H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Mathilde Johansson H2H: 0-1

Mathilde Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mathilde Johansson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mathilde Johansson won the 2012 Wimbledon round of 128 3-6 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mathilde Johansson
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mathilde Johansson #81 3-6 6-0 6-3 Lesia Tsurenko #99 Match data Jun 27, 2012* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mathilde Johansson #235 #59 992 1,616 44 75 37.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Mathilde Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #184 1,497 0 0
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #140 1,491 0 0
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2007 2–5 28.6% #134 1,477 0 0
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0 2008 3–7 30.0% #85 1,474 0 0
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0 2009 8–13 38.1% #125 1,470 0 0
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0 2010 0–3 0.0% #102 1,450 0 0
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1 2011 10–11 47.6% #77 1,533 0 0
27 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2 2012 12–15 44.4% #87 1,581 0 0
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3 2013 8–15 34.8% #136 1,538 0 0
29 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4 2014 0–2 0.0% #207 1,526 0 0
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4 2015 0–1 0.0% #173 1,514 0 0
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Mathilde Johansson
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2009 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 2 7 9 22.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1% — 8 26 34 23.5% 31 43 74 41.9% 5 6 11 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's and 103/119 of Mathilde Johansson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Mathilde Johansson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6% 2005 1/1 0.0 2.0 57.4% 48.4% 34.8% 58.3% 0.0% 42.6% 26.8%
21 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6% 2006 2/3 0.5 3.0 59.7% 53.3% 37.1% 66.2% 20.8% 47.3% 37.0%
22 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4% 2007 6/7 0.7 6.2 54.6% 58.1% 40.8% 39.7% 33.5% 50.7% 43.8%
23 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7% 2008 8/10 1.3 6.0 61.3% 54.6% 38.3% 42.3% 41.4% 48.0% 42.0%
24 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8% 2009 17/21 0.9 8.2 57.7% 57.6% 41.7% 49.6% 49.0% 50.9% 43.2%
25 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5% 2010 2/3 0.0 7.0 61.1% 59.7% 31.4% 50.6% 30.0% 49.2% 36.8%
26 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8% 2011 20/21 1.4 6.4 58.9% 61.5% 41.1% 48.5% 51.7% 53.5% 46.7%
27 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5% 2012 25/27 0.4 6.1 64.7% 58.6% 43.1% 49.3% 51.5% 53.0% 48.8%
28 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4% 2013 19/23 0.9 8.2 57.7% 58.6% 39.9% 44.8% 39.2% 50.8% 44.1%
29 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0% 2014 2/2 0.5 9.0 59.6% 66.1% 35.6% 58.3% 31.0% 53.5% 37.3%
30 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8% 2015 1/1 3.0 4.0 49.2% 63.3% 25.8% 22.2% 62.5% 44.3% 46.5%
31 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7% — 103/119 0.9 6.8 59.8% 58.7% 40.7% 47.6% 45.2% 51.4% 44.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Mathilde Johansson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15 2005 1498 100.7 +1.49 +1.81 0.467 35.8% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.24
21 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08 2006 1492 91.7 -1.86 -1.85 0.702 42.6% — +32 — 33.3% -2.50 — — — +0.26
22 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34 2007 1477 106.6 -1.95 -1.02 0.889 46.9% +6 — — 33.3% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.09
23 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05 2008 1475 101.5 -1.92 +0.35 0.808 45.1% -22 +96 — 29.2% -1.88 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.30
24 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31 2009 1471 105.9 -3.20 -1.71 0.879 47.2% -6 +49 — 41.2% -1.10 4–7 (36%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 +0.58
25 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32 2010 1450 104.0 +0.47 -0.49 0.725 43.7% — +29 — 0.0% -2.83 — — — -0.32
26 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25 2011 1534 117.2 -2.08 +1.17 1.003 50.1% -62 +28 — 51.0% 0.00 2–5 (29%) 4–2 (67%) 98.9 -0.16
27 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38 2012 1582 115.4 -2.40 +2.48 1.039 50.8% -144 +87 — 47.8% +0.10 5–8 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.7 +0.87
28 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57 2013 1538 102.8 -3.58 -0.60 0.896 47.4% -107 +28 +56 40.0% -0.91 3–6 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 95.5 +0.22
29 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69 2014 1526 103.1 +0.52 +2.59 0.803 45.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.39
30 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24 2015 1514 97.9 -0.76 +0.19 0.834 45.5% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.04
31 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91 2016 1471 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84 — 1616 110.5 -2.45 +0.43 0.924 48.2% -61 +51 +56 40.6% -0.79 17–28 (38%) 12–11 (52%) 96.4 +0.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.