H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-1

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2017 Rome third round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
UKR Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 18, 2017* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Venus Williams #12 6-4 6-3 Lesia Tsurenko #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #370 #23 2,030 1,889 180 200 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,485 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,507 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,511 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,738 0 1 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2016 19–19 50.0% #57 1,728 0 2 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,699 0 3 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2018 26–18 59.1% #27 1,814 0 4 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,734 0 4 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,746 0 4 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,738 0 4 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,745 0 4 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,866 0 4 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,693 0 4 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47