H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 1-2
Yanina Wickmayer holds a 2–1 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yanina Wickmayer leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yanina Wickmayer won the 2017 US Open first round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-3 6-1 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2015* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-3 7-6(3) | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2014* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Yanina Wickmayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 |