H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 1-2

Yanina Wickmayer holds a 2–1 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yanina Wickmayer leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yanina Wickmayer won the 2017 US Open first round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Yanina Wickmayer
Belgium Age 36 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yanina Wickmayer #129 6-3 6-1 Lesia Tsurenko #30 Match data Aug 30, 2017* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lesia Tsurenko #54 6-3 7-6(3) Yanina Wickmayer #98 Match data Aug 12, 2015* R64 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Yanina Wickmayer #57 7-6(4) 6-4 Lesia Tsurenko #140 Match data Feb 27, 2014* R32 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Yanina Wickmayer #765 #12 3,320 1,933 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Yanina Wickmayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2008 10–14 41.7% #73 1,540 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 32–16 66.7% #16 1,844 0 2
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2010 31–21 59.6% #23 1,770 0 3
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2011 28–18 60.9% #26 1,772 0 3
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2012 29–26 52.7% #23 1,618 0 3
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0 2013 17–24 41.5% #51 1,589 0 3
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0 2014 13–19 40.6% #75 1,556 0 3
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0 2015 18–17 51.4% #41 1,684 0 4
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1 2016 19–24 44.2% #58 1,635 0 5
27 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2 2017 11–14 44.0% #115 1,638 0 5
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3 2018 3–5 37.5% #122 1,644 0 5
29 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4 2019 2–2 50.0% #152 1,582 0 5
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4 2020 0–1 0.0% #166 1,578 0 5
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4 2022 2–3 40.0% #321 1,561 0 5
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4 2023 8–7 53.3% #71 1,655 0 5
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4 2024 0–3 0.0% #765 1,532 0 5
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4 2025 0–3 0.0% — 1,501 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Yanina Wickmayer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 10 15 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 19 11 30 63.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
20 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 22 14 36 61.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2011 13 10 23 56.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 16 15 31 51.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 13 12 25 52.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 15 15 30 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2023 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1% — — — — — 141 139 280 50.4% 36 40 76 47.4% 40 34 74 54.1% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's and 396/440 of Yanina Wickmayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Yanina Wickmayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 20/24 3.6 4.6 59.0% 66.6% 45.8% 56.1% 42.9% 58.2% 40.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 47/48 2.3 4.2 64.9% 65.0% 47.0% 48.0% 51.3% 58.7% 46.6%
20 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6% 2010 49/52 3.2 4.0 65.2% 65.8% 50.0% 55.9% 47.0% 60.1% 44.2%
21 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6% 2011 43/46 2.8 3.4 66.4% 62.9% 45.7% 48.4% 49.9% 56.9% 42.5%
22 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4% 2012 48/55 1.6 3.8 64.8% 60.4% 47.6% 48.1% 50.4% 55.7% 45.3%
23 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7% 2013 36/41 1.6 4.7 62.4% 62.1% 41.6% 53.8% 48.3% 54.4% 40.2%
24 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8% 2014 31/32 1.6 4.5 60.8% 59.2% 43.5% 46.3% 43.7% 52.5% 39.2%
25 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5% 2015 23/35 2.8 4.7 64.6% 63.4% 46.1% 56.5% 41.3% 57.4% 38.2%
26 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8% 2016 35/43 3.9 3.6 62.9% 65.8% 43.4% 43.8% 49.2% 57.4% 40.9%
27 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5% 2017 25/25 3.3 3.4 62.7% 65.5% 43.0% 59.3% 40.7% 57.0% 38.8%
28 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4% 2018 8/8 1.9 2.3 67.2% 62.1% 44.1% 48.5% 38.3% 56.1% 40.4%
29 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0% 2019 4/4 5.8 3.5 61.1% 61.6% 50.3% 60.8% 38.1% 57.0% 40.3%
30 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8% 2020 1/1 5.0 3.0 46.9% 69.6% 42.3% 0.0% 0.0% 55.1% 32.2%
31 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3% 2022 5/5 1.6 2.6 66.4% 66.2% 34.6% 58.7% 37.6% 55.6% 45.4%
33 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1% 2023 15/15 2.6 4.3 64.2% 61.8% 39.4% 55.5% 53.6% 53.7% 44.3%
34 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3% 2024 3/3 1.0 4.3 70.9% 61.3% 39.0% 42.9% 30.9% 55.1% 41.1%
35 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7% 2025 3/3 1.0 4.0 65.6% 45.4% 29.2% 30.6% 29.4% 40.1% 36.6%
Career — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7% — 396/440 2.6 4.0 63.9% 63.3% 45.2% 50.9% 46.9% 56.6% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Yanina Wickmayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1541 118.5 +1.10 -2.21 0.965 49.3% -12 — +153 45.6% -0.37 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 96.9 -0.19
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 138.9 +2.89 +2.24 1.129 52.5% -67 -217 -63 63.4% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 108.5 -0.38
20 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15 2010 1771 147.6 +3.55 +1.24 1.108 52.1% -25 -73 +42 58.2% +0.54 9–9 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 -0.09
21 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08 2011 1772 137.9 +1.53 -0.96 0.987 49.9% -34 -18 +65 58.7% +0.55 13–5 (72%) 6–5 (55%) 109.7 -0.40
22 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34 2012 1618 128.3 +0.06 +1.37 1.022 50.5% +42 +98 +183 54.1% +0.12 6–10 (38%) 7–7 (50%) 93.9 +3.14
23 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05 2013 1590 122.3 -1.06 -2.39 0.882 47.6% +21 +17 +202 44.3% -0.46 8–9 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 -0.49
24 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31 2014 1556 109.0 -2.75 -3.18 0.825 46.0% -10 +67 +179 42.4% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.0 +0.61
25 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32 2015 1684 131.2 +0.06 -2.08 0.896 48.0% -6 -86 +30 50.6% +0.10 8–5 (62%) 0–4 (0%) 100.6 -1.93
26 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25 2016 1635 130.0 +1.11 -1.54 0.959 49.0% +11 -60 +35 46.6% -0.07 7–10 (41%) 3–10 (23%) 90.8 -1.27
27 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38 2017 1638 118.0 +0.72 -2.73 0.903 48.1% +22 -82 +35 43.6% -0.56 3–2 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 101.3 -0.90
28 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57 2018 1644 116.3 -0.80 -1.10 0.921 48.4% +42 — +44 37.5% -0.75 — 0–2 — +0.44
29 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69 2019 1582 105.8 0.00 +0.01 0.938 48.6% — — — 50.0% -0.70 1–1 1–0 — +0.07
30 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24 2020 1578 101.7 -0.40 +1.21 0.717 42.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23
31 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04 2022 1561 112.3 -0.11 +0.15 1.022 50.5% +6 — — 45.5% +0.09 0–1 — — -0.10
33 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59 2023 1655 132.7 -1.00 +0.89 0.957 49.0% 0 — — 56.7% +0.27 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.31
34 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77 2024 1533 98.0 -1.89 -3.41 0.914 47.1% -5 — — 25.0% -1.38 0–2 1–1 — +0.10
35 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10 2025 1502 92.0 -2.96 -3.50 0.612 38.4% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.17
Career — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84 — 1934 133.4 +0.75 -0.56 0.975 49.5% -5 -28 +78 51.3% 0.00 72–75 (49%) 54–60 (47%) 98.9 -0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.