H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lesley Charles vs Chris Oneil H2H: 3-2
Lesley Charles holds a 3–2 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Lesley Charles leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Oneil won the 1976 Madrid La Moraleja final 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1976* | Madrid La Moraleja | WTA 250 | F | — | Chris Oneil | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Lesley Charles | Match data |
| Mar 13, 1976* | Madrid Auto Club | WTA 250 | SF | — | Lesley Charles | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| May 15, 1975* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lesley Charles | 6-3 6-3 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1975* | Hampstead | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Chris Oneil | 6-4 3-6 8-6 | Lesley Charles | Match data |
| Dec 26, 1972 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lesley Charles | 7-6 5-7 6-2 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Charles | — | — | — | 1,797 | 198 | 139 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lesley Charles | Chris Oneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1970 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 1972 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 1973 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 |
| 1974 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 22–12 | 64.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 |
| 1977 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 |
| 1978 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 |
| 1979 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 |
| 1980 | 23–7 | 76.7% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 15 | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 |
| 1981 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 16 | 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 |