H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesley Charles vs Lindsey Beaven H2H: 2-2
Lesley Charles and Lindsey Beaven are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Lesley Charles won the 1975 Guildford quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 74
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1975* | Guildford | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Lesley Charles | 6-2 6-1 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| Apr 28, 1974* | Norwich | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Lesley Charles | 7-5 6-1 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| May 4, 1973* | Sutton | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lindsey Beaven | 6-3 6-3 | Lesley Charles | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1971* | Sheffield 1 | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Lindsey Beaven | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Lesley Charles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Charles | — | — | — | 1,797 | 198 | 139 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Charles | Lindsey Beaven | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1975 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1976 | 22–12 | 64.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1977 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1978 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1979 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1980 | 23–7 | 76.7% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 15 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1981 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |